Dreadlock Girl
12Aug/104

Foreign Flicks Review: Some Good, Some Great.

http://thegidcumbs.com/dblog/archives/the_girl_from_paris.jpg

The Girl From Paris is about a woman named Sandrine who has what many others desire, a good job, a life in the city of Paris-yet she dreams of nothing more than  to be out of the claustrophobic hold that it all has on her. When she brings up the idea with her mother, she finds her family is disapproving of her notions to take up schooling in agriculture and to buy a farm in the country. Sandrine leaves Paris shaking the dust off of her feet and aims to show them all that she can make it where no single woman has ever been able or happy before-to a little dairy goat farm in the middle of nowhere where winters are harsh and lonely.

I enjoyed watching The Girl From Paris because there are some things I can relate to and enjoyed it as a whole, however it felt unresolved when the final credits crept by. I would recommend it, as it was interesting to watch, the setting was beautiful, the farming environment enticing and worth the watch. Rating: 2.5/5

Deets: The Girl From Paris (Une hirondelle a fait le printemps) 2001, France. Directed by Christian Carion.


http://temperomental.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/mostly_martha.jpg

In Mostly Martha (original German title: Bella Martha) Martha has always craved perfection and predictability. Life changes all too quickly when her niece comes to live with her, teaching Martha that life a lived predictably really isn't as important as she had thought, but Martha may not be able to do it. Another chef moves into her kitchen to help out while she is coping with taking full time care of her niece, but to her he is a threat not a help. Her rigidity and strictness are what drive her,they are what have made her who she is, but while she watches her competitor cook she sees he is driven by passion.

This is a spectacular flick that I think well worth the time. A complex, and yet simply delightful plot pull through the entire film with a satisfying conclusion. However you will need to have some good snacks to eat while this one rolls because the food if not will make you salivate, and even with snacks it still may. I recommend this one completely. Rating: 4.5/5

There is an American version of this flick that I also enjoyed, but was a remake of Mostly Martha, it is called No Reservations.

Details: German film, 2002. Directed by Sandra Nettelbeck.


http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com/images/vitus.jpg

Vitus is the story of how a gifted mind can be one's downfall if not tethered to reality in some way. Vitus is obviously a musical and intellectual genius at a very early age, however this causes his parents to desire performance from him. Vitus gift as a pianist continues to be his parent's focus as he battles with not developing peer relationships, finding the need to prove his professors wrong, and crushes on a much older girl- his babysitter.

As his parents pressures increase Vitus will find a way out of having to fit their mold and will choose to follow another route in a silent display of rebellion that will rock his parents world. The twists and turns in this flick are delicious to watch unfold. Vitus has one true ally throughout the film, his grandfather, who always treats him as a regular kid-letting him do things he could never do at home.

This is one of the best flicks I have seen, the acting is incredible (my favourites are Teo Gheorghiu, Bruno Ganz- LOVE THEM!!) and the storyline is brilliant. I give it a full %100 recommendation. You have to watch it. Rating: 5/5

Deets: Vitus (2006) Switzerland. Directed by Fredi M. Murer


http://content.foxsearchlight.com/files/uploaded/utsm_mailer.jpg

Under the Same Moon (La Misma Luna) is about  mother who crosses the border to make a way for her son. he is left in Mexico, taken care of by his grandmother still he only has eyes for his mom. She calls every Sunday and as much as he longs to believe that she will show up any day he knows she isn't coming for him soon. After a traumatic event he takes matters into his own hands and then it is up to love, luck and whole lot of hope to get him to his mother in the U.S.

Tender, true and heart wrenching, this flick has it all. Beautiful, completely. Passionate, intense...just so well done. I love this flick and recommend it. Another must see. Rating: 4/5

Deets: Under the Same Moon (2008) Mexico. Directed by Patricia Riggen


What flicks (foreign or otherwise) do you recommend I watch and review??Have you seen a great one recently you want to share?? I'd love to hear of it.

20May/100

A History of Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years

IMG_6194What is the real story of Christianity? It is not only a belief that has driven people to compose, create, design and destroy it is part of human history, a unifying yet dis-unifying joint in who we are as civilizations.

Diarmaid MacCulloch's DVD series journey starts out in Jerusalem and  then soon after he takes a tour through orthodoxy and Catholicism. Visiting chapels and many ancient churches of the east he finds things are not always as they would seem.  He is not afraid of ancient arguments about the christian faith, this is not a series on theology, but about history, the history of Christianity.

When Christians were fleeing from Jerusalem, many of them didn't head west toward Rome because of  the prior treatment of the disciples, but on east to Turkey and Syria. Monasticism and the death of self came out of  the these first Christians from the east, shunning the later alliance with Constantine and the powerful Rome. It was a desire to not affiliate with wealth and power.  Many gathered in communities to worship God in purity and serenity. Christianity deepened divisions between the east, Antioch and the west, Rome. The biggest dividing question being, who was Jesus and what was his relationship to God? Christians believe he is the Son of God, and if He isn't his death on the cross would not be enough to get a sinner, or all sinners to Heaven.

In this first DVD episode, Diarmaid MacCulloch follows Christianity eastward, even after the splits and divisions all the way to China. Through the next discs he will take IMG_6216a turn from Jerusalem to the west, to see what happened to Christianity when it was backed up by powerful friends.

Right after I finished the first I wished I had the second disk so I could keep right on watching. A History of Christianity is a marvelous tool to learn where our ancestors fought and what they fought against- many times they fought in different places than we live, but we are overcoming the same  struggles- against power, wealth and to come to a place of closer unity to the Christ of the Bible. I HIGHLY recommend this BBC series, very well done, not another boring history lesson. I love it!


513 MacCulloch photo.JPG

Q & A with Diarmaid MacCulloch

Host of A History of Christianity

Q: A History of Christianity corrects several misconceptions regarding Christianity’s past and traditions, beginning with the earliest days of the fledgling religion. How does the true history of Christianity’s origins differ from the version most of us know?

A:  Today, Christianity is seen as a Western faith. Indeed, many in the Muslim world would see Western lifestyles as Christian lifestyles. But Christianity is not by origin a Western religion. Its beginnings are in the Middle East, where there still exist churches which have been Eastern since the earliest Christian era. For centuries, Christianity flourished in the East, and indeed, at one point, it was poised to triumph in Asia, maybe even in China. The headquarters of Christianity might well have been Baghdad rather than Rome, and if that had happened, Western Christianity would have been very different. The story of the first Christianity tells us the Christian faith is, in fact, hugely diverse with many identities. The history of Christianity has been the never-ending rebirth of a meeting with Jesus Christ, the resurrected son of God. For some, like the Oriental and Orthodox churches, the meeting has been through ritual and tradition, or the inner life of the mystic. For Western Catholics, through obedience to the Church. In Protestant churches, through the Bible. And it’s the variety that is so remarkable in Christianity’s journey. It’s reached into every continent and adapted to new cultures. That’s the hallmark of a world religion.

IMG_6109Q:  Why does Christian history fascinate you?

A:  When I was a small boy, my parents used to drive me around historic churches searching out whatever looked interesting, but soon, they realized they had created a monster. The history of the church became my life’s work. For me, no other subject can rival its scale and drama. For 2,000 years, Christianity has been one of the great players in world history, inspiring faith but also squalid politics. It is an epic story starring a cast of extraordinary people—from Jesus himself and the first apostles to empresses, kings, and popes, from reformers and champions of human conscience to crusaders and sadists. Religious belief can transform us for good or ill. It has brought human beings to acts of criminal folly as well as the highest achievements of goodness and creativity. I will tell the story of both extremes. Christianity has survived persecution, splits, wars of religion, mockery, hatred. Today there are two billion Christians, a third of humanity—Protestant, Catholic, Orthodox, Pentecostal, and many more. Deep down, the Christian faith boasts a shared core—but what is it? This is something I wanted to explore on a truly global scale.

Q:  Your search for Christianity’s true history begins with a visit to the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem. Why does this location tell us about the Christianity’s global roots?

A:  The Church of the Holy Sepulcher is said to have been built where Jesus was crucified and buried. At its heart is what’s believed to be his tomb. The church built around the tomb of Jesus is the starting point for a forgotten story, a story that may overturn your preconceptions about early Christianity. Pride of place in this building goes to two churches—the Greek Orthodox church and the Roman Catholic church. It’s true that Orthodoxy and Catholicism dominated Christianity in Europe, in the West, for its first 1,500 years. But as you walk around the edges of the church, you can’t fail to notice other curious little chapels. They’re not Western or European. They’re Middle Eastern and African, and they tell a very different story about the origins of Christianity. Around the back of Jesus’ tomb is Egypt’s Coptic church. There are plenty of other churches at this location, but you need to know where to look: the Syriac Orthodox church, the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, to name a few. Many versions of Christian history would make these churches unorthodox, yet they are far older than better known versions of Christianity like Protestantism. It’s easy for tourists to dismiss these ancient churches as quaint or even irrelevant. But that would be a big mistake.

513 DVD cover-AmbroseQ: What are some general differences between the expansion of Western and Eastern Christianity?

A:  In the West, Christianity became the religion of an entire empire. This meant the end of persecution. It brought power and wealth. It gave the Christian faith a chance at becoming a universal religion. In theory, it embraced Christians in the Eastern Empire as well as in the West.

But in the east, many Christians were unimpressed by the new alliance—even hostile. At stake were fundamental disagreements about the direction the faith should take. Jesus had told people to abandon wealth, not to ally with the rich and powerful. It was Eastern Christians in Syria who led the way, showing Western Christianity a pattern for spiritual life. We call this pattern monasticism, a way of life involving isolation from the world, austerity, and suffering. The expansion of Eastern Christianity has often taken place apart from any empire. It has often been a religion of dialogue, not conquest.

Q:  In the series, you point out that the big theme that distinguishes Roman Catholicism from other denominations is the centralization of power, both in the church as an institution in the lives of its followers and within the church itself. When did this transfer of power take place?

A:  The crucial steps toward centralized power were taken 30 years after Constantine’s death in 337, during the time of Pope Damasus I, when the Bishop of Rome was established as bishop in unbroken succession from St. Peter. I’ll stick my neck out and say that I don’t believe that Peter was Bishop of Rome. And you’d be hard put to find anyone before the time of Pope Damasus who would make that claim. But as the successor to Peter, the Bishop of Rome became the Holy Father, the pope of all Christians in the West. The Catholic church was no longer an upstart. It had friends in high places now, a religion fit for gentlemen. The centrality of church power increased further during the time of Pope Gregory, around the fifth and sixth centuries. Gregory wanted to micromanage the fate of every soul in Europe. And to drive through this change, the papacy first targeted the clergy. Gregory made a change that was to redefine the popular image of the catholic cleric. Before that, most clergy who were not monks were expected to marry, but Gregory started a campaign to make all clergy to be automatically celibate. That’s because he wanted the best, the most disciplined, and the most loyal clergy possible. With its foot-soldiers in place, the Catholic church now had a presence in every village, town, and parish doing its best to control every aspect of people’s lives. What emerged was a single Latin Western society, unified by the Latin language and underpinned by a complex religious bureaucracy

Q:  What really happened in the time commonly known as the Dark Ages?

A: In the 5th century, Barbarian invaders overran the western half of the empire. And in 1410, they took Rome itself. At that moment, the Latin church could easily have crumbled and become a footnote in European history. The centuries while the church stood alone after the fall of Rome are often referred to as the Dark Ages, as if civilization collapsed. Actually, that’s not true. The Church was not about to die with the Empire, but it was at a crossroads. How did the Latin Church survive on its own? Well, the decisions made by the wily politician Pope Damasus began to pay off. The church still had influential friends, and it survived because of the great choice made by the people still holding to the last shreds of imperial power—the Roman aristocracy. Once they’d ruled the Roman Empire, and now they decided to rule the Church. Roman nobleman became bishops to preserve the world they loved. When the empire collapsed, the church stepped into the power vacuum. The Western church had survived. It had adapted. 400 years earlier, Christianity was against the establishment. Now it was the establishment.

Q: What has been the prevailing religious feeling in the “Christian West” for the past fifty years?

A: I come from three generations of Anglican clergy. My father was a good and faithful priest, much loved by his congregation. His was still the church of Christendom, which had endured since the time of Constantine the Great. But even as a boy, I could see that the sort of church and society he served was dying. My own life story makes me a symbol of something distinctive to Western Christianity—a skepticism, a tendency to doubt which has transformed Western culture and transformed Christianity. In the years after WWII, I was a little boy growing up in Suffolk. I knew of the challenges facing Christianity. In the 1950s, church attendance actually increased in a chastened, frightened Europe. But that mood passed. The horrors of the first half of the 20th century had raised the old question Voltaire had posed about the goodness of God: In Auschwitz, where was a loving God? Europe was sickened by any system which made absolute claims to truth: Communism, Fascism, Christianity. So it was hardly surprising that in the second half of the 20th century an unprecedented, almost frivolous mood confronted European Christianity: religious indifference and apathy. Social changes brought a more relaxed attitude toward sex and marriage, movement between social classes, and more individual choice. In the face of that, fewer people chose to spend Sunday in church. For 2,000 years, the Christian answer to the big questions of existence was faith in God, as revealed in Jesus Christ. That made sense of life and death. It taught right from wrong. But the recent history of Christianity has been described as a sea of faith ebbing away before the relentless advance of science and reason and progress. It’s actually a much more surprising story. The tide of faith, perversely, flows back in, for Christianity has a remarkable resilience. And in crisis, it has rediscovered deep and enduring truths about itself.

Q: So where is Christianity going in the twenty-first century? Should God be worried?

A: It depends where you look. In my journeys around Asia, Africa, and Latin America, I’ve been struck by the exuberance of Christian life. Pentecostals, in particular…I think they surprise us. In fact, they may surprise themselves by what they find on their own Christian adventure. Outside Europe, numbers of Christians are rising at a phenomenal pace, but in the West they are falling. So what of the church here, in the Christian continent which first discovered doubt? If the history of the church teaches us anything, it’s that it has an exceptional knack for reinventing itself in the face of fresh dangers. The modern world has plenty to throw at the church—skepticism, freedom, choice, but modernity can’t escape the oldest questions at the heart of the messy business of being human, questions of right and wrong, purpose and meaning. A wise old Dominican friar once reminded me of the words of St. Thomas Aquinas: “God is not the answer. He is the question.” And as long as the church goes on trying to ask the question, it will never die. Remember that Christianity is a very young religion. It spans a mere 2,000 years out of 150,000 years of human history. It would be very surprising if it had already revealed all of its secrets. We’ll wait and see. That’s just what Christians have been doing ever since they gathered as the sky turned black in Jerusalem at the foot of the cross on Golgotha.

The DVD set is available at retailers, including Sam’s Club. The series is also available on Amazon.com and www.ambrosevideo.com.

28Aug/093

Flick Review: The Visitor

http://www.cinemarts.org/2009Posters/visitor1.jpg

The Visitor
Directed by Tom McCarthy
Indie Drama
PG 13 (for brief strong language)
103 Min.
April, 2007

Awards:
Best Music - 2008 St. Louis Gateway Film Critics Associat
Best Original Screenplay - Tom McCarthy - 2008 San Diego Film Critics Association
Best Independent Film - 2008 National Board of Review
Best Director - 2008 Independent Spirit Awards
Go to The New York Times for the whole list of (tons) of awards The Visitor was nominated for as well as those which it received.

A grieving and bored-with-life professor (Richard Jenkins) is just getting by in life. He survives committing himself to nothing more than the minimum effort required to make it day by day- he eats, sleeps and works. When his boss sends him to represent a paper he co-authored he finds something waiting for him in his apartment. Unsure and very cautious he takes a full step forward, it is by mistake that he finds himself  with the hope of human relationships. The need for family, for a human bond will make the widowed professor Walter Vale assess the real value of all that he has and has lost- and needs to get back.

http://blog.beliefnet.com/moviemom/the%20visitor.jpg

This flick is the type where while (and after) you watch it you just can't imagine how it could have not been brought to your attention before. I only have the Netflix automated suggestions computer to thank that I have even seen it now. For me there are films, flicks and movies...those which you choose because you just want to veg and sit and watch- they aren't really worth the time, but they are just filler in a busy day. And then there are movies like The Visitor, which I watched almost two weeks ago and still I am thinking about it, chewing it, loving it. The actors, (Richard Jenkins, Haaz Sleiman, Danai Gurira and Hiam Abbass) although not really bigwigs, they did some of the best acting I have seen in a long time. Plot, acting and cinematography all work together to make The Visitor a flick worth its weight in books. Yes, this is a must see, period.

The Visitor is a story of  grief, of relationship, of family and the loss that is felt when people leave. Holes which we think can never be filled again. In truth that exact place cannot be perfectly matched. But because we fear moving on it is easy to be trapped in a place where our joy is limited- by no one else but ourselves. Choosing to live in the past so as not to forget, so as not to move on. Fear and love hold tight, only to be broken open when the grieving person allows for joy to come back in.

When life takes turns to drastically satisfy are we ready to jump with it, or is the choice  of 'moving on' just as hard as living  a life in mourning?

I have a new award, I think you will like it and I am honoured to give it to this flick before any other one, yes this movie is to cluck about!

stellar five flick

http://blog.oregonlive.com/ent_impact_tvfilm/2008/02/the-visitor.JPG

This is The Visitor trailer, however I will caution you that if you already want to see it after the review that you NOT watch it....I wish I had expereienced the film for the first time while watching it. I feel like too much is given away in the trailer. But if you aren't convinced yet, after my review....check out the trailer, then you will be won over completely. Promise.

If you are a Netflix customer, you can view The Visitor as a "watch instantly" flick, and really you should head over and do that right now.

Check out The Visitor links:

The Visitor on Rotten Tomatoes. com
The Visitor: Netflix
New York Times Critics' Pick: The Visitor Review

20Dec/072

ONCE

This is a super serious must-see. There really is no choice in it. If you have not seen it you missing out on one of those experiences that only comes all too infrequently in film. I cannot get enough of this film ONCE. I haven't ever heard anyone say one negative thing about it. It really is just one of those. It is a low-budget, draw-you-in, easy to love film that is quirky, odd and precocious as well. It is about two musicians and their love of music, while trying not to love eachother. It just came out yesterday on DVD...so you better get to it. Brad and I watched it in the theater and loved it, but couldn't wait for it to come out on DVD because we had a hard time understanding what they were saying sometimes and we needed subtitles. If you miss out on this film- it is a pretty serious mistake.